Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5F3DC865 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81820 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2012 19:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81791 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2012 19:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ambari-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81782 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2012 19:05:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:05:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:05:03 +0000 Received: by obcva7 with SMTP id va7so1866224obc.6 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=jfD8BJDiBK/NchIqwkHz1AOvVx5nHlRQNBuU3B6OIXI=; b=YGwnW1DPjrXpYUSylFRi97uo4gPpjdrPf1u/sm8ffQfpnUb8ON/FmQCagWZJHxZ40W YhIqJKMQzVkOq+Vs7M0STdDlDsaxfbft1fXcjMQ1U44jEQdMV75CwwtCInYoZCUq33Tc IuOC0Q8x3JqgHViiUJ8DRR/6hH/Xls28BKGUaNyFabDsuzWSzlbOL9Khl90I0CBwK2A7 5r+2Ee2GI9Uzslx+h2LvBDo1TOtMY4uMVfiS1fBvHACwdKl6moE8vmVmhuZl5Sq4CCdO thidX7GxSFmMEBiRBun9RhFZZMFrPlnwak8jeUAFQ5Wwx27JWVR0IqN4gAJ22WFaH6Up fBhA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.16.3 with SMTP id b3mr46156981obd.72.1342033482261; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.176.34 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Cluster blue print concept From: Mahadev Konar To: ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm492xVjefudyhUSUyCJxHcr+ex/4Yu8pG5dQ7BbKp29sQBF5oVFb1rXpI56U9B7ORZ2ktV Thanks Devaraj. mahadev On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: > The attachment didn't go thru. Just checkout the trunk rev 1176156 [svn c= o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari@1176156] and then look = at trunk/examples directory.. > > On Jul 9, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > >> For the uninitiated, here is what I remember about blueprint: >> Blueprint was a concept for describing cluster configurations (including= repositories, stack definitions and individual component configurations). = Blueprints would be versioned, and, one could inherit from a blueprint, etc= . to define/override properties. For example, Ambari could ship with a defa= ult blueprint which defines config values/properties that are appropriate t= o the best of the Ambari developer's knowledge. In the production site, one= could inherit that blueprint and only override certain properties with sit= e specific values. >> Attached a sample blueprint json file that inherits from another bluepri= nt, and selectively overrides a property in the namenode config.. >> >> >> >> On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Eric Yang wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The original cluster blue print has been removed from Ambari website, >>> and the cluster blue print concept has been removed from current >>> Ambari code base. It would be great to have a specification of master >>> configuration for construct or clone other clusters. This could be >>> offered as open specification for community to implement or enhance >>> the deployment execution engine. What does the community think about >>> this idea? >>> >>> regards, >>> Eric >> >