Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80E8FC359 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 01:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67286 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2012 01:05:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67252 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2012 01:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ambari-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67241 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2012 01:05:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:05:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:04:53 +0000 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so1709366pbb.6 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:04:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=0z1jitj3QGadWQrWUIpDo2p/OtROgHEMwFa6mDiR56E=; b=KbhVMFrH4JICajSN08b15z90fSS+rikyC2KwYCjw3iQVTAKraFv6DXqJ62C67DSnDs +tWFCXp86fTOtIjf9krS8FKTkrfhpws33f3+6DRjROntUTsZtVc2RtSZgW2Illr0RuE4 D1omZOsjlYYpna7uASuhET+ljwJ+ujeEq+CPSEdfoj5DVptwPP6jWehsO60WNf9S0rNT zwafpX3yQ6KokS+rNFFCzspCu0pqO8TEEJ8/TrkptNeQu+HU55yqRPTGgR4OhSQBjQth 04n2J463pOREsnM/97XfjxTw+L7PmQh+a1HxawqZrM9B1yyTHgRaG2NlDwxRzJ+vho/e Owgg== Received: by 10.68.213.102 with SMTP id nr6mr14198510pbc.112.1339117472036; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hdpproxy1.hdp.cc1.yahoo.com. [98.137.232.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ru4sm5871654pbc.66.2012.06.07.18.04.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: Current State of Trunk From: Vikram Dixit In-Reply-To: <7CB1F0A3-37E2-4E3E-988D-038ECB8C7266@me.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:04:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <932C04B3-82F9-46AF-92CF-4373CDD0603D@me.com> <7CB1F0A3-37E2-4E3E-988D-038ECB8C7266@me.com> To: ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk74CLcSg4HGqgV+4kpl0L34Y1Zgu2bve8Wy9CkFObAlq8gxNW5OJrpzmhthscR2l01hFn1 Hi Deniz, Your observation is right. Ambari-186 is completely different from = trunk. Hopefully it will replace it. Regardless, I am of the opinion that this tree should be ready for = consumption in 2-3 weeks. We are currently stabilizing this code base. Thank you for your interest. Regards Vikram. On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Deniz Demir wrote: > I am still hoping a response to the following questions. I am also = curious for the time table for the first release. >=20 > Thanks, > Deniz >=20 >=20 > On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:59 PM, Deniz Demir wrote: >=20 >> It looks like Ambari-186 is completely different from what is in the = trunk. Do you mean it will replace what is currently in trunk? Or does = it work with or on top of trunk code?=20 >>=20 >> I mean, what is the relationship between trunk and ambari-186 branch? >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Deniz >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Vitthal Suhas Gogate wrote: >>=20 >>> Ambari-186 should be in a working state soon. Its actively developed = and >>> tested at Hortonworks. Once it is working, I plan to propose = merging it >>> with trunk resolving some architectural differences before making = the first >>> Ambari release. >>>=20 >>> --Suhas >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Deniz Demir = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hello, >>>>=20 >>>> I am trying to understand Ambari and its code base, and I think I = am a >>>> little confused. "trunk" is 5 months old, and all activity seems to = be in >>>> branch-186, under hmc. I am wondering whether Ambari design got = changed >>>> compared with what is described in the "High-level Design" section = of the >>>> home page. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Deniz >>>>=20 >>=20 >=20