incubator-allura-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OSS Forge feature comparison chart
Date Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:27:26 GMT
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Cory Johns <johnsca@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have created a feature comparison chart comparing Allura to some other
> OSS Forge platforms, at:
>
> https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Feature%20Comparison/


nice !

BTW other related comparisons are :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue-tracking_systems
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_time_tracking_software
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software


>
> I'd like to put it to the community for comment; are there any platforms or
> features that should be added,


yes, Apache™ Bloodhound
;)


> are there any inaccuracies in the data,
>

if behavior added by plugin counts then afaict , yes . For Trac the matrix
would look like

BSD  ||  Python  ||  SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL  ||  Yes  ||  Yes  ||
 Yes  ||  Yes  ||  Yes  ||  No
Yes  ||  Yes  ||  Yes [1]_  ||  Yes [2]_  ||  Yes [3]_  ||  No  ||  Yes  ||
 Yes  ||  Yes [4]_  ||  Yes

Apache™ Bloodhound should only differ in Project discovery = yes

should it have more reference citations, etc?
>

.. [1] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DiscussionPlugin
.. [2] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/FullBlogPlugin
.. [3] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DownloadsPlugin
.. [4] http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/ThemeEnginePlugin

[...]

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc

Apache™ Bloodhound contributor
http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound
http://blood-hound.net

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message