Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-allura-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-allura-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDF21107F3 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98590 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2013 17:15:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-allura-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98548 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2013 17:15:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact allura-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: allura-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list allura-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98537 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2013 17:15:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:15:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 76.96.27.227 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of dave@brondsema.net) Received: from [76.96.27.227] (HELO qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:15:08 +0000 Received: from omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dTNk1m0050EPcho01VEmAM; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:14:46 +0000 Received: from b.local ([68.61.106.151]) by omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dVEk1m00W3G0l1w8MVEl08; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:14:46 +0000 Message-ID: <525D7804.8040507@brondsema.net> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:14:44 -0400 From: Dave Brondsema User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: allura-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Tickets mailing list? References: <525D52A5.3060300@rcbowen.com> <525D68F7.5060902@rcbowen.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1381857286; bh=2ZCXmMhYTv49/iqT1ko9v39EglnQC0JBGJvZfrqv6kY=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=AArB6ki3TNXZ8pfdwvXALtpH5IA51u/RUs4M7vughQL4GHQQ+ipMIDSqdPzaRxOMd r5XYP2EnUAKVLnF7bfG/Vz93MblP2/jnLxTh7xSW1CzPei7wWQUQfzEcIZ2RvBD49j j6gqMuH07QgGSFgFHT+n3UJrkyfwtApsRzPmhY61dsaaDi/ARIKY7N3WclXjI8d5vj hTdYciBQv6z7iz2SKWLErsXhTCPB4RliIU73rctk2qbbYcFOKAQtgO56drtGMOgQ/C 43qYyCHdm6ND6F/S9G/vrF8l3qkDOVSQRzCLOeNJFFCQXvN0ZXRRV8gd9i/jE3ogch UrunAvRW0DRlQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That's a good use case and a separate bugs list is a good solution. Asking everyone to set up a filter for the bugs is not too friendly. For reference, spamassassin's dev list gets a lot of ticket updates. Just an example, doesn't mean it's better. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-dev/ I'd be ok with tickets on a separate mailing list. I'd also be interested in merging the allura-dev and allura-users mailing lists. The users list is very quiet currently and most new incubator projects only start with one (add the -users list when the need is there). On 10/15/13 1:01 PM, Daniel Hinojosa wrote: > Okay, thank you Rich. Then, this is a great topic for the list to come to > consensus on, yes? > > For my part, I would like to see a separate list for ticket and one for > discussion. Totally agree w/Rich on the value and I utilize a very similar > model to Rich's in this case. > > d. > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> Projects I'm involved in have a separate bugs@ mailing list where the >> tickets go. Historically, I do a terrible job of keeping up with ticket >> traffic, but am subscribed to various keywords (usually 'documentation' in >> my case) so that I can see what I need to see. >> >> If someone is heavily involved in development they would, of course, be >> subscribed to both lists, but if someone was casually involved, or trying >> to get involved, the huge volume of tickets traffic is somewhat >> overwhelming. Unfortunately, removing the tickets from the dev list leaves >> the impression that nothing happens on the dev list, which is also not true. >> >> So ... I don't know. I know we've discussed this before, and I should go >> back and read that. I'm sure we've already arrived at a consensus, and I >> just forgot in my frustration. :) >> >> I tried to set up GMail filters for the Allura tickets, but my patterns >> seem to be matching everything. I need to figure that out. >> >> >> On 10/15/2013 11:33 AM, Daniel Hinojosa wrote: >> >>> Hey Rich, >>> >>> As our mentor, do you have a recommendation here? What is ASF best >>> practice >>> in this regard? Do other teams also do things as we do, or do they deal >>> with tickets only as tickets and have a separate discussion list? >>> >>> d. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> I'm finding it very, very difficult to keep up with traffic on the dev >>>> mailing list, due to the huge volume of ticket auto-emails. I realize >>>> that >>>> most of the dev discussion does in fact happen in tickets, but the end >>>> result is that I'm simply not keeping up. I wonder if it might be time to >>>> split ticket mail into a separate list? Would that help, or would it just >>>> move the problem to another list? >>>> >>>> I really want to keep up with how the project is doing but I'm not sure >>>> how to do that as things are now, and I'm afraid that it also makes it >>>> very >>>> hard for new folks to get into the project. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rich Bowen >>>> rbowen@rcbowen.com >>>> Shosholoza >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Rich Bowen >> rbowen@rcbowen.com >> Shosholoza >> >> > > -- Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net http://www.brondsema.net : personal http://www.splike.com : programming <><