incubator-allura-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Invernizzi <stefano.invernizz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: User stats and organizations
Date Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:33:03 GMT
Hi,
Yes, you are right! I changed the name of the parameter in the
configuration file, but I forgot to do the same in the test.ini file,
therefore all our tests resulted in errors or failures. I changed the
parameter in that file and now it looks like everything is ok. I'm sorry
about that.

Stefano


2013/2/1 Tim Van Steenburgh <tvansteenburgh@gmail.com>

> Hey guys,
>
> I've started to look at this again. Getting several errors and failures
> running `nosetests` in ForgeUserStats. Can you look into that?
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Tim Van Steenburgh wrote:
>
> > Thanks guys! I'm in the middle of another code review at the moment, but
> I'll take a look soon.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Stefano Invernizzi wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Tim,
> > > After fixing the issues you reported in your first review, we also
> fixed
> > > other things today and we committed them to the repository.
> > > We hope this improves our code. We also implemented the loop to
> register
> > > additional listeners, as I had explained in the discussion of the
> ticket a
> > > few days ago. Particularly, we forced the parameter in the
> configuration
> > > file to be the equal to the entry point name, followed by ".enable", so
> > > that the whole mechanism can be easily extended.
> > > Let us know what you think about this additional commits and if there
> other
> > > things to be improved. Thank you again for your review!
> > >
> > > Stefano & Simone
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/1/18 Tim Van Steenburgh <tvansteenburgh@gmail.com (mailto:
> tvansteenburgh@gmail.com)>
> > >
> > > > Stefano & Simone,
> > > >
> > > > I've posted a first review of the User stats code on
> > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/5453/.
> > > >
> > > > Tim Van Steenburgh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Tim Van Steenburgh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Stefano & Simone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the delay, a lot of us were on extended vacation for the
> > > > Christmas holiday. I've begun looking at your branch and intend to
> provide
> > > > some feedback in the near future. Thanks for your contribution to
> Allura!
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim Van Steenburgh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Stefano Invernizzi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We still didn't get any feedback about the uploaded code.
> Please, let
> > > > us
> > > > > > know what you think about it and if there's something we can
> improve.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Simone & Stefano
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2012/12/13 Stefano Invernizzi <stefano.invernizzi88@gmail.com(mailto:
> stefano.invernizzi88@gmail.com) (mailto:
> > > > stefano.invernizzi88@gmail.com (mailto:
> stefano.invernizzi88@gmail.com))>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > Since yesterday the code is available on the repository.
As
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > suggested in
> > > > > > > the proposed code contributors policy, I created a new
branch
> named
> > > > > > > si/5453. Feel free to comment our work, and send feedbacks
or
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > suggestions
> > > > > > > about possible improvements.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Stefano & Simone
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2012/12/11 Simone Gatti <simone.gatti88@gmail.com (mailto:
> simone.gatti88@gmail.com) (mailto:
> > > > simone.gatti88@gmail.com (mailto:simone.gatti88@gmail.com))>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > thank you for your feedback!!
> > > > > > > > First of all, in the next hours we'll create a branch
with
> the
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > extension
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > UserStats, so that you can see our code to discuss
it and its
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > possible
> > > > > > > > improvements. After that we'll upload the extensions
of the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Organization
> > > > > > > > and OrganizationStats.
> > > > > > > > About the possibility to define an organization based
on a
> shared
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > topic of
> > > > > > > > interest, we have not considered it. We assumed that
the
> kind of
> > > > > > > > organization could be: "for-profit business", "foundation
or
> other
> > > > > > > > non-profit organization" or "research and/or education
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > institution", like
> > > > > > > > the organizations in the real world. We don't know
if the
> concept
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > is the
> > > > > > > > same, in that case we can easily add a new type of
> organization.
> > > > > > > > (e.g."group of interest").
> > > > > > > > As for Rich's proposal it's a great idea! We have
considered
> it
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > but we
> > > > > > > > later decided to focus on other aspects in our thesis.
> Anyway it's
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > best
> > > > > > > > way to use the additional data included in the profile.
> > > > > > > > I don't have commit access on the repository to upload
my
> code.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Since we
> > > > > > > > developed it together, Stefano will commit it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Simone.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2012/12/10 Alvaro del Castillo <acs@bitergia.com
(mailto:
> acs@bitergia.com) (mailto:
> > > > acs@bitergia.com (mailto:acs@bitergia.com))>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dear Simone,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > First of all, I am sorry about the delayed response.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > El jue, 29-11-2012 a las 19:06 +0100, Simone
Gatti
> escribió:
> > > > > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > During the last weeks, while discussing
our work on
> including
> > > > new
> > > > > > > > details
> > > > > > > > > > in users' profiles on the forge, I and Stefano
> Invernizzi also
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > continued
> > > > > > > > > > working on the other features we introduced
in one of
> our first
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > messages
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > the mailing list, back in July.
> > > > > > > > > > Now we have completed the implementation
of these tools,
> and
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > we would
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > to get feedbacks from you in order to check
if it's
> possible to
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > > them on the Allura platform.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The additional features we implemented consist
of two
> main
> > > > parts.
> > > > > > > > First
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > all, we included the concept of organization,
namely
> companies,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > foundations
> > > > > > > > > > or other non-profit organizations and research
and
> education
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > institutions.
> > > > > > > > > > Each organization is now allowed to create
a profile,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > including some
> > > > > > > > > > details about it, like a description, its
working
> fields, its
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > size,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > etc...
> > > > > > > > > > . Moreover, users can be linked to the organizations
they
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > belong to,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > projects can be linked to the organizations
developing
> them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > For both
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > kinds of relationships, we implemented a
two-way
> mechanism:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > the user
> > > > > > > > > > requests to be registered as a member of
the
> organization and
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > organization has to confirm it, or vice-versa.
> Similarly, an
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > organization
> > > > > > > > > > sends a request to be listed as the developer
of a
> project,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > and the
> > > > > > > > > > administrator of the project has to accept
it, or
> vice-versa.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When a
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > user
> > > > > > > > > > leaves an organization, he can set this
on the forge,
> and the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > enrollment
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > this organization will be shown as a past
membership.
> The same
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > applies
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > project collaborations: an organization
can freely set a
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > collaboration
> > > > > > > > > > within a project as completed, because the
organization
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > doesn't want
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > continue working on the project, and it
will be shown as
> a past
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > involvement.
> > > > > > > > > > We believe this features could be very useful
on a forge
> which
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > used by
> > > > > > > > > > more than one organization, because it allows
to have a
> better
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > awareness
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the community, knowing how users working
on a project are
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > organized in
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > real life. It can also increase trust for
those projects
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > developed by
> > > > > > > > > > well-known organizations.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The second feature we developed is related
to users, and
> > > > consits of a
> > > > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > > > of metrics gathered from their activity.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is a really interesting thing for me!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > These metrics include the number
> > > > > > > > > > of created or modified artifacts (also separated
for
> different
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > kinds
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > artifacts), the number of assigned tickets,
solved
> tickets and
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "revoked"
> > > > > > > > > > tickets, namely tickets which were assigned
to a user but
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > whose owner
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > later changed. Moreover, the number of commits
is
> collected,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > together
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > the total number of added or modified lines
of code by
> the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > user. For a
> > > > > > > > > > certain user, all these metrics are shown
on a page on
> the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > form, as a
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > total
> > > > > > > > > > value since the user's registration, as
well as an
> average
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > per-month
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > value.
> > > > > > > > > > The metrics are also calculated considering
the last 30
> days
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > only, in
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > order
> > > > > > > > > > to allow to check whether the user is still
active on the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > forge or
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > not,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > if he is increasing his efforts on the forge
or not.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is this code already available?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In Bitergia our main focus is analyzing software
projects
> using
> > > > metrics
> > > > > > > > > and we are integrating some of our tools in Allura.
We are
> using
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > > different approach from you, getting the metrics
from a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > consolidated
> > > > > > > > > database that gathers the data from Allura, but
at the
> end, the
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > metrics
> > > > > > > > > are really similar.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We are working in different kind of visualization
also, so
> we
> > > > can share
> > > > > > > > > also here experiences.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Moreover, it is also possible to see these
values for a
> single
> > > > > > > > category
> > > > > > > > > > only, namely considering all the data regarding
projects
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > tagged as
> > > > > > > > > > belonging to that category. A graph showing
the number of
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > joined
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > projects
> > > > > > > > > > by the user for each category is also shown,
to
> highlight the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > kind of
> > > > > > > > > > applications the user is focused on.
> > > > > > > > > > Finally, the previously listed statistics
are also
> calculated
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > organizations, by considering the activity
of the users
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > enrolled in
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > organization itself. Particularly, since
each user can
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > possibly work
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > more than one organization on the forge,
as well as
> working as
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > individual programmer, organizations' statistics
are
> calculated
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > considering
> > > > > > > > > > only those activities performed by its members
on
> projects to
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > which
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > organizatione is explicitely involved.
> > > > > > > > > > We think these features are useful to allow
users to
> have a
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > deeper
> > > > > > > > > > awareness of someone else's experience and
interests,
> and this
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > could
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > help in identifying partners for a certain
project.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > These features are implemented as external
features and
> can be
> > > > easily
> > > > > > > > > > enabled or disabled by setting boolean parameters
in the
> .ini
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > file.
> > > > > > > > > > Therefore, it is possible to enable organizations
only,
> without
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > including
> > > > > > > > > > the statistics features, or including statistics
for
> users
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > only, and
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > Of course, it is not possible to enable
organization
> statistics
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > without
> > > > > > > > > > enabling the concept of organization on
the forge.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We would like to know what you think about
these
> features, and
> > > > we
> > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > like to know how we can provide you our
code to get a
> feedback
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > and, eventually, to discuss improvements
and changes on
> it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think it is a really good use case por the
code
> contributors
> > > > policy
> > > > > > > > > proposed in the mailing list.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Stefano is now
> > > > > > > > > > allowed to write on the repositoy, but since
I am not
> allowed
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > to do
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > since these features should obviously be
discussed
> before being
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > included
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > the project, I don't know if working there,
even on a new
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > branch, is
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > best solution.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think so. Create a new experimental branch
and upload
> the code
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > Allura so for others developers like me, it is
easy to
> start
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > playing
> > > > > > > > > with it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Also, let us know if you prefer to check
the two features
> > > > > > > > > > separately or not. Probably, it would be
easier to do it
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > incrementally,
> > > > > > > > > > considering one of them at a time.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Simone Gatti and Stefano Invernizzi
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo
> > > > > > > > > [o] [o] acs@bitergia.com (mailto:acs@bitergia.com)
> (mailto:acs@bitergia.com) - CTO,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Software Engineer
> > > > > > > > > | V | http://www.bitergia.com
> > > > > > > > > | |
> > > > > > > > > -ooo-ooo-
> > > > > > > > > |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo
> > > > > > > > > [o] [o] acs@bitergia.com (mailto:acs@bitergia.com)
> (mailto:acs@bitergia.com) - CTO,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Software Engineer
> > > > > > > > > | V | http://www.bitergia.com
> > > > > > > > > | |
> > > > > > > > > -ooo-ooo-
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message