Mailing-List: contact allura-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: allura-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.62.48 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of dave@brondsema.net)
Message-ID: <5023D824.7000808@brondsema.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:32:52 -0400
From: Dave Brondsema <dave@brondsema.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: allura-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #156: Local copy of bloodhound part of Apache
 repo for browse functionality
References: <052.a76dbce2fd5b36ba0b55ec49ab072067@incubator.apache.org>
 <067.9f1edfc161cac25f48e9a23ee7166717@incubator.apache.org>
 <50215E93.8090602@wandisco.com>
 <CABD8fLX95F+RrGt_coNRuo8vBwLWEVBhbuHUJX9WXdAiscp66A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABD8fLX95F+RrGt_coNRuo8vBwLWEVBhbuHUJX9WXdAiscp66A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That sounds great.  AFAIK an NFS mount will be fine for Allura to read from.

By the way, I've subscribed to the bloodhound-dev list also.  It seems
that allura and bloodhound have a lot in common: python code/project
management tools both going through incubation :)

-Dave

On 8/8/12 5:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Very cool!
> 
> But with that said... I was on IRC, and the Infra guys might actually
> create a full repository mirror for us. The thing is that Apache
> Allura (also incubating) will want a copy of their project(s), too.
> Tho... I think they're going with Git, but the concept is the same.
> Bloodhound and Allura both need local read-access to repositories.
> 
> Infra was thinking about sync'ing repository copies over to a box (I
> forget the name). The BH and Allura VMs would be migrated over to that
> same box. The repositories would then be exposed via NFS, and the two
> VMs would (locally) mount that NFS share.
> 
> I believe the Right Answer here is for both projects to confirm that
> this option is workable, and for us to ask Infra to start setting it
> up.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Cheers,
> -g
> 
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>> Not sure if this could be of interest beyond Bloodhound. It is a very simple
>> script (and quite possibly over-complicated in reality).
>>
>> The attachment referred to is here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/attachment/ticket/156/emptyrevs.py
>>
>> Just tested it on 1229640 empty commits:
>>
>>    python3 emptyrevs.py 1229640 | eatmydata svnadmin
>>    --bypass-prop-validation load repos/
>>
>> which took about 2 hours - I suspect that the svnadmin load was the real
>> bottleneck.. it is just a few seconds to create about 92M of data if you
>> direct to a file instead.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>     Gary
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/07/2012 06:47 PM, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
>>>
>>> #156: Local copy of bloodhound part of Apache repo for browse
>>> functionality
>>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>>    Reporter:  gjm        |      Owner:  nobody
>>>        Type:  task       |     Status:  new
>>>    Priority:  critical   |  Milestone:  Release 2
>>>   Component:  siteadmin  |    Version:
>>> Resolution:             |   Keywords:
>>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>>
>>> Comment (by gjm):
>>>
>>>   As part of my investigation around creating a mirror of the bloodhound
>>>   portion, I have written a very simple script (only complicated when I
>>>   decided to have a quick look at the argparse module and python2/3
>>> issues),
>>>   inspired by a suggestion from Philip Martin.
>>>
>>>   I have attached that script [attachment:emptyrevs.py here]. It may be
>>>   worth putting in the bloodhound repository in case we need it again of
>>>   course.
>>>
>>
> 


-- 
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
              <><