From adffaces-user-return-2417-apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Mar 21 09:28:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 65993 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2007 09:28:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2007 09:28:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 36705 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 09:28:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36687 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 09:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact adffaces-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36678 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2007 09:28:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:28:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:28:49 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so261693uge for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:28:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=m/x6cLvwxIOgnUQwHqHO+cLA2RNDesKDwZNaBm1cCElCJjNnYhIdyd75PsRmq62aZThhs5m42ScR2Gtqo3o+zldiXWy66oW6uTbd+Yy3BvspoQJYeWlTrmUS+vtUx9+ILRLttYJjmpycD71ZuWk/KxSvQb5GAQd7RHSfG0iEUGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=otrQC3Gye977LD+JQrz9l5QPoCTKSc2UvhecxJWZrCBI/WCXVOyCRW+08Uqc/FtJ15GwhlY0S/7RzdTcPW5FY30KTTcBQEOxyBXkWreeEAWxinZxhJ4+hWHIAKwE8IDvYJ97sgdNZZpxVcL70JA0npm6DA4EhZGxVb2C5ci/REo= Received: by 10.114.132.5 with SMTP id f5mr94824wad.1174469307601; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.46.6 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <71235db40703210228q6c1b9e11l3265d5e4d8e4cb50@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:28:27 +0100 From: "Matthias Wessendorf" Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Templating with trinidad once more In-Reply-To: <1174464220.6253.30.camel@linws5181.bkw-fmb.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1174464220.6253.30.camel@linws5181.bkw-fmb.ch> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 415b4d1e30de17c2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Kuno, > I'd like use a basic template feature with trinidad and like to inform > me about the actual situation of this issue. I've found a statement of > Matthias Wessendorf, he states that one should use facelets. However, > facelets isn't a standard. Furthermore, I couldn't find any examples well, not a standard in the meaning of JCP, but build on-top of JSF and very close to JSF, compared to other stuff like Tiles (the creator of Facelets is part of the JSF 1.2 EG). An example of using Trinidad + Facelets is here: http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ (and some other stuff) > with trinidad and my migrated JSF examples didn't work ("illegal > component hierarchy detected, expected UIXCommand but found another type > of component instead."). I reckon, it might be a problem with nested > forms, however, this would be another entry... Meaning
... ...
... ? This is invalid in HTML and using Apache MyFaces as your JSF runtine, you will get a warning, when nesting the corresponding components (no idea, what the RI tells you). > In my opinion, this is more than one reason do not move to facelets. Are That's up to you. There is also Clay, also close to JSF, since was developed having JSF in mind. Gary, might know how good Clay is working w/ Trinidad. HTH, Matthias > there any other options? Did somebody get Tiles working with trinidad? > Is there any roadmap for this issue? > Many thanks > > Kuno > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com