From adffaces-user-return-1783-apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Jan 11 09:21:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74840 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 09:21:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 09:21:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 94908 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 09:22:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94890 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 09:22:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact adffaces-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94881 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2007 09:22:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:22:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.205.33.42] (HELO mail-relay-2.tiscali.it) (213.205.33.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:21:53 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (84.223.64.206) by mail-relay-2.tiscali.it (7.2.079) id 459E6CCE0009411F; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:21:31 +0100 Message-ID: <45A601A0.4090904@tecnotp.it> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:21:36 +0100 From: Renzo Tomaselli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org, "users@facelets.dev.java.net" Subject: [Trinidad][Facelets] tr:regionDef vs. ui:component Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I cross-post this topic since it's related to a comparison between Facelets ui:component and Trinidad tr:regionDef.
I use facelets with Trinidad and it works fine, with the exception that ui:components are handled as text inclusion, so that they are not real first class UI components and they cannot be conditionally included from java at runtime.
From tr:regionDef documentation it seems that regions are kind of components too, so I wonder about comparing them vs. ui:components. Furthermore, are regions "normal" components I can handle from java at runtime ?
Thanks -- Renzo