From adffaces-user-return-1573-apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Dec 14 10:43:14 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 66412 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2006 10:43:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 10:43:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12555 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2006 10:43:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12535 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2006 10:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact adffaces-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12526 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2006 10:43:20 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:43:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.205.33.42] (HELO mail-relay-2.tiscali.it) (213.205.33.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:43:09 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (84.223.104.245) by mail-relay-2.tiscali.it (7.2.078) id 4576D997000EAD43 for adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:42:44 +0100 Message-ID: <45812AA3.6020002@tecnotp.it> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:42:43 +0100 From: Renzo Tomaselli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: where are binaries References: <8F9BA684796C2848A3DD79037C5F75BF19D204@MOES0037.tcc.local> In-Reply-To: <8F9BA684796C2848A3DD79037C5F75BF19D204@MOES0037.tcc.local> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Döring Markus wrote: 
Mixing up the frameworks you mentioned should be no problem, only the
      
MyFaces Tobago Project has some known incompatibility with Trinidad.


and with tomahawk too
-M
    


Hehe, ok, that is new to me.
But if you ask me, I would choose Trinidad and try to use it as the only framework.
Trinidad has so many components that you should be able to do almost anything with them.
The only thing you should use together with Trinidad is Facelets because it help you not running into a lot of problems you will counter if you use thinks like <jsp:forEach>. Also Facelets is already integrated into Trinidad so it's no big problem to use it, just check the wiki for more informations on this.
I totally agree. I already use Tomahawk with Facelets (no jsp), and I would much prefer to globally switch to Trinidad + Facelets. What I miss is the real feeling about any useful component (saveState ?) I would lose. I guess many others asked themselves the same question, so I wonder if anybody came up with a throrough comparison, at least to sketch overlapping components.
Documentation alone seems a huge point affecting such decision.

Renzo