incubator-adffaces-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Use of <tr:document> tag
Date Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:16:34 GMT
docment creates these elements <html>, <body>, and <head>,

the trh is the other way to do that.

I'd prefer document w/ the facet,

M

On 10/7/06, Naresh Bhatia <NBhatia@sapient.com> wrote:
> Thanks Adam. I just found the <trh:html>, <trh:head> and <trh:body>
> tags. Any advantage of using these vs. the "metaContainer" facet?
>
> Naresh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Winer [mailto:awiner@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 10:31 AM
> To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Use of <tr:document> tag
>
> Use the "metaContainer" facet:
>
> <tr:document>
>   <f:facet name="metaContainer">
>     <f:verbatim><script ...../></f:verbatim>
>   </f:facet>
> </tr:document>
>
>
> On 10/7/06, Naresh Bhatia <NBhatia@sapient.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since the <tr:document> tag encapsulates the generation of <html>,
> > <body>, and <head> elements, how do I force generation of some
> elements
> > in to <head>. For example, I would like my <script> tags to go to the
> > <head>. (May be not a good example because it appears that <script>
> tags
> > are forced into <head> anyway. However, I don't see that documented in
> > the tag library docs.)
> >
> >
> >
> > Naresh
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message