incubator-adffaces-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Causevic, Dzenan" <dcause...@navisite.com>
Subject RE: Trinidad replaces ADF Faces?
Date Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:24:21 GMT
Well I did not get it from there. I got it from ADF Faces official
project page at Oracle's web site. I wish you told me this few months
ago. I was googling all over the place for any link with adf-share.lib
and couldn't find it. And that was exactly why it was braking up. That
library file was missing, I was searching for it to try with it, and
couldn't find it until now.

Now I am happily engaged with Trinidad and have no intention of going
back. I still think ADF Faces was badly documented if I couldn't resolve
this issue.

I personally think Trinidad for the above reasons (damn adf-share.jar
and such things) is a better choice. Never had any problem so far.

Dzenan Causevic
Software Web Developer
NaviSite, Inc.
Syracuse, NY
(315) 453-2912 x5346

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Smith [mailto:unobriani@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:14 PM
To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trinidad replaces ADF Faces?

If you download the ADF Faces standalone from here
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/jdev/htdocs/adfjsf.ht
ml
The ADFShare jar is in with the demo application that comes with it (
adf-faces-demo.war)
WEB-INF/lib/adf-share-3549S.jar

On 10/12/06, Causevic, Dzenan <dcausevic@navisite.com> wrote:
>
> It was probably then ADFShare.jar because I never could find that
file.
> I was suspecting it might be the reason but I did not get that library
> with my regular distribution. I only got API and IMPL ones. Where did
> you get ADFShare.jar anyway?
>
> Bug was manifested in a following way: I could compile and build the
> project, however in order to run it I had to remove IMPL jar. Once I
> removed it, I could run the project but <%@taglib%> directive did not
> work so it was like a magic circle.
>
> Dzenan Causevic
> Software Web Developer
> NaviSite, Inc.
> Syracuse, NY
> (315) 453-2912 x5346
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Smith [mailto:unobriani@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 2:58 PM
> To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Trinidad replaces ADF Faces?
>
> Nope, I was using ADF Faces 10.1.3.0.4 with Netbeans 5.5 Beta 2
>
> What specifically was the problem/bug?
>
> On 10/12/06, Causevic, Dzenan <dcausevic@navisite.com> wrote:
> >
> > You must have used something else then version 10. It must have been
> > version 9 or below.
> >
> > Dzenan Causevic
> > Software Web Developer
> > NaviSite, Inc.
> > Syracuse, NY
> > (315) 453-2912 x5346
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Smith [mailto:unobriani@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 2:27 PM
> > To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Trinidad replaces ADF Faces?
> >
> > I am a Netbeans user as well.  I really did not have any problems
> using
> > ADF
> > Faces with Netbeans 5.5 Beta2 or RC1.  The big sticking point was
> > including
> > the ADFShare jar in with it.  The ADF Docs say you don't need it,
but
> i
> > could not build without it.
> >
> > On 10/12/06, Causevic, Dzenan <dcausevic@navisite.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From my experience I think that's exactly the case. That was my
> > > conclusion. I first tried ADF Faces and I had problems to install
it
> > to work
> > > with NetBeans. Actually I discovered a serious bug that prevents
ADF
> > Faces
> > > v10 from installing with NetBeans v5.5 correctly. It took me a
long
> > time
> > > until I figured it out, 'cos I did not get any kind of technical
> > support
> > > from their discussion list. Nobody knew anything why I was having
> > difficulty
> > > installing it with NetBeans. That was very frustrating, so I dont
> > blame if
> > > even Oracle people itself are switching to Trinidad.
> > >
> > > Basically my above mentioned problems resulted in me trying
Trinidad
> > as an
> > > alternative and once I got my hands on it I was quite happy to
have
> > found
> > > it. I personally dont see any reason to use ADF Faces over
Trinidad.
> > > Trinidad is much, much better supported + it has a brigther future
> as
> > a
> > > project I believe.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brian Smith [mailto:unobriani@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thu 10/12/2006 1:08 PM
> > > To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Trinidad replaces ADF Faces?
> > >
> > > Will Trinidad replace the ADF Faces component set?  I have heard
> that
> > > Oracle
> > > is using Trinidad builds heavily internally.  Is the plan to
> desupport
> > ADF
> > > Faces components once Trinidad makes it through incubation?  Is
> there
> > > plans
> > > to support Trinidad (visual designer and such) in an upcoming
> release
> > of
> > > JDeveloper?  Thanks for any light shed.
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message