From adffaces-user-return-374-apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jun 27 22:24:56 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 62453 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2006 22:24:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2006 22:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 81902 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 22:24:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81884 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 22:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact adffaces-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81875 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2006 22:24:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of awiner@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:54 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q2so2232657uge for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IkT5UTgIUYlIKcYs3d+7+LHSo7sCwfWHC1qIDwchDFygzxoBeeHtVo67E9xUgTQAic8HRlQAEcIR1XLR7jIwsK/U/7lsIobgUqnvLcczuqaN4NmKk+pLExQFoK7aIHYG+KAPsFSLMFaUvDmk2iSCwZ87JttbmqMn0rGUaCnPyhk= Received: by 10.67.100.17 with SMTP id c17mr75923ugm; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.99.17 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6dac79b90606271524m13b0e14byc541bbe4a506dd75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:24:33 -0700 From: "Adam Winer" To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: ADF Faces Rich Client components coming to Trinidad? In-Reply-To: <467251f60606271507n4577ef90s65d72fe16a6c9f00@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44A1A9C8.2020101@s-rod.com> <467251f60606271507n4577ef90s65d72fe16a6c9f00@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N We're still working internally on the when and how to get that stuff (which is my day job) moved over. My focus in open source land is getting Trinidad out of the incubator - one promise at a time! ;) -- Adam On 6/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia wrote: > That would be very very nice, a rich table is a requirement for new > projects these days.. > > Cosma > > 2006/6/27, Rogers Reilly : > > Hi all, > > > > I came across the following blog entry about upcoming AJAXified > > components possibly coming to Trinidad: > > http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1242 Sounds like they've got some > > very cool components (there's a video link there, too, which looks > > sharp), including Drop 'n' Drag and an extensible JS architecture. > > > > My question is (a) can anyone from Oracle confirm/comment on this list?, > > and (b) if these components are coming in, how do they fit with other > > AJAX efforts in MyFaces? We've already got people integrating Dojo > > widgets in the regular MyFaces trunk, somebody working on improving PPR > > to use XMLHTTPRequestObject for an SoC project (which it sounds like > > these new components may have already done), and various other efforts > > like Avatar/JSF 1.2. That's an awful lot of JS floating around with > > ostensibly similar goals. > > > > Of course I'm not about to complain about all the OS options upcoming > > for rich client development, but I would like to get a sense for the > > landscape. Right now, I find myself wrapping a lot of the Yahoo UI Ajax > > stuff in Facelets tags (used to use Dojo, but YUI is dead simple, > > well-documented, and anything so complicated I'd need Dojo for, I prefer > > to handle with Trinidad PPR on the server), but have thought about > > wrapping them instead as more formal JMaki components. Trying to decide > > if it's worth the effort--Facelets + YUI is really a breeze--if stuff > > like Drag 'n' Drop is right around the corner anyway from Oracle. > > > > Thanks in advance for any answers. > > -Rogers > > >