incubator-adffaces-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA) <>
Subject [jira] Closed: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default handling
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:30:32 GMT
     [ ]
Matthias Weßendorf closed ADFFACES-33:

    Resolution: Fixed

thanks MATT for the patch

> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>          Key: ADFFACES-33
>          URL:
>      Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Build
>  Environment: Facet metadata
>     Reporter: Matt Cooper
>     Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
>     Priority: Trivial
>  Attachments: adf-faces.patch
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the
same value as "facet-name".  The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves
as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time.
 By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name
is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry.  Since both pieces are identical,
we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more
descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive
display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary
display-name entries are removed.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message