incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Trinidad sandbox?
Date Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:46:28 GMT
yeah,

if others agree, I will create *branch* for that and play with Danny's
contribution.

@Danny: do you already have signed the CLA ?
Contact me offline if you have questions on that

-M

On 12/19/06, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> I personally like the latter..  Unfortunately very few things can be
> developed in a Vacuume.  At the very least it should have it's own copy
> of impl.
>
> Scott
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Looks like all here have already agreed on that one.
> > What do you have in mind?
> > a *separate* project with trinidad-api/-impl as dependency,
> > where we can "test" components like the popup from danny?
> >
> > Or a *branch* that really acts as a sandbox to "play" with ideas on
> > components
> > and when stable (or close to it) the stuff get's merged into _core_ ?
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel
> >> directory
> >> to trinidad and plugins.  This'd give us a place to add more substantial
> >> contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them
> >> time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before
> >> moving
> >> in to the main libraries.  It'd also give me a chance for committers
> >> like
> >> me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the
> >> trunk
> >> immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for
> >> multi-component validation, for example).
> >>
> >> Feedback?  +1 from me. ;)
> >>
> >> -- Adam
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message