incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Winer" <awi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: Trinidad sandbox?
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:14:53 GMT
Of course, this only covers high risk projects that are completely
seperable from the main line and don't require modifications
there.

-- Adam


On 12/14/06, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, but high risk projects could be committed to the sandbox first
> and allow them to ferment a bit without effecting the main line.  I like it!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Adam Winer wrote:
> > On 12/14/06, Danny Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> +1 (non binding).
> >>
> >> Q1 - Would this add more workload to those with Commit priviledge, or
> >> could
> >> we open up the commit access a little more for this project?
> >
> > I don't think there is any process for a less-restrictive commit
> > access for one portion of the product.  My understanding
> > is that a committer is a committer is a committer...  Someone
> > with more detailed ASF expertise can confirm.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel
> >> directory
> >> > to trinidad and plugins.  This'd give us a place to add more
> >> substantial
> >> > contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them
> >> > time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before
> >> moving
> >> > in to the main libraries.  It'd also give me a chance for
> >> committers like
> >> > me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the
> >> > trunk
> >> > immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for
> >> > multi-component validation, for example).
> >> >
> >> > Feedback?  +1 from me. ;)
> >> >
> >> > -- Adam
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Chordiant Software Inc.
> >> www.chordiant.com
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message