incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Trinidad sandbox?
Date Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:40:16 GMT
I personally like the latter..  Unfortunately very few things can be 
developed in a Vacuume.  At the very least it should have it's own copy 
of impl.

Scott

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Looks like all here have already agreed on that one.
> What do you have in mind?
> a *separate* project with trinidad-api/-impl as dependency,
> where we can "test" components like the popup from danny?
>
> Or a *branch* that really acts as a sandbox to "play" with ideas on 
> components
> and when stable (or close to it) the stuff get's merged into _core_ ?
>
> -M
>
> On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel 
>> directory
>> to trinidad and plugins.  This'd give us a place to add more substantial
>> contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them
>> time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before 
>> moving
>> in to the main libraries.  It'd also give me a chance for committers 
>> like
>> me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the 
>> trunk
>> immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for
>> multi-component validation, for example).
>>
>> Feedback?  +1 from me. ;)
>>
>> -- Adam
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message