incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Trinidad sandbox?
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:34:55 GMT
Right, but high risk projects could be committed to the sandbox first 
and allow them to ferment a bit without effecting the main line.  I like it!

+1 (non-binding)

Adam Winer wrote:
> On 12/14/06, Danny Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 (non binding).
>>
>> Q1 - Would this add more workload to those with Commit priviledge, or 
>> could
>> we open up the commit access a little more for this project?
>
> I don't think there is any process for a less-restrictive commit
> access for one portion of the product.  My understanding
> is that a committer is a committer is a committer...  Someone
> with more detailed ASF expertise can confirm.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
>>
>> On 12/14/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel 
>> directory
>> > to trinidad and plugins.  This'd give us a place to add more 
>> substantial
>> > contributions - Danny Robinson's popup, for example - and give them
>> > time to be played around with, fixed up, APIs tweaked, etc., before 
>> moving
>> > in to the main libraries.  It'd also give me a chance for 
>> committers like
>> > me to add experimental features that definitely shouldn't go into the
>> > trunk
>> > immediately, or perhaps ever (some ideas I've been toying with for
>> > multi-component validation, for example).
>> >
>> > Feedback?  +1 from me. ;)
>> >
>> > -- Adam
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Chordiant Software Inc.
>> www.chordiant.com
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message