incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Marinschek" <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] JavaScript Popup Calendar
Date Sat, 08 Jul 2006 15:26:21 GMT
yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't have a popup calendar so far!

regards,

Martin

On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>  cool to hear martin,
>
> what's up, should we both take a look at dojo?
> (the xml way)?
>
> On 7/7/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One thing more - I don't like the javascript codebase of the current
> > tomahawk calendar, just to put this into the discussion.
> >
> > So if someone comes up with a better solution (and the same or better
> > functionality) I'll happily put this component into tomahawk as well.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > More...
> > >
> > > at ApacheCon Bernd and me also discussed about, what's with the tobago
> > > code base. Stuff like upload can be *unified* for all these three libs.
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Moving to dev.....
> > > >
> > > > good idea
> > > >
> > > > > Well, not to be a pain about it, but the inability of some users
to
> > > > > use a released product like Tomahawk shouldn't be driving the
> > > > > development decisions of a podling.
> > > >
> > > > sure!
> > > >
> > > > > The need to have a popup calendar looks like a perfect trial run
of
> > > > > merging the two code bases, and I'd hate to see someone go out and
> > > > > reinvent the popup calendar "wheel" yet another time when we've
> > > > > already got two or three of them.
> > > >
> > > > sure, popup cal. is just a *simple* example of that.
> > > > We have a wiki for identifing some task. Feel free to add content.
> > > > (see [1]).
> > > >
> > > > > Realistically, merging the two is probably going to be more a matter
> > > > > of porting Tomahawk components over to Trinidad than the other way
> > > > > around, I'm guessing, so maybe I'm arguing over semantics.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, sorta. The Trinidad podling for instance has already
> > > > *buid-in*support for Facelets. Tomahawk has also some goodies. This
> > > > task (merging) won't be a short one (IMO)
> > > >
> > > > -Matt
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared
> > > >
> > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Hey Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes that is the goal. but for some reasons user's won't / can't
use
> > > > > > Tomahawk (or MyFaces) in their production. I think that was
the reason
> > > > > > for this thread. Creating a custom one on top of the Trinidad
Podling
> > > > > > is ok for me. For the tomahawk stuff, we should take a look
at Dojo
> > > > > > ([1]). On the ApacheCon I saw that they have now "xml namespaces",
> > > > > > means <dojo:wiget ... /> instead of *hacking* JS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know some projects, that are not allowed to use MyFaces; they
stick
> > > > > > with IBM or the RI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Could someone refresh my memory?  Was the eventual goal
to merge
> > > > > > > Trinidad and Tomahawk?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If so, I think creating Yet Another Popup Calendar rather
than making
> > > > > > > the existing tomahawk popup calendars play nice with Trinidad
is a
> > > > > > > step in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, I could be off-base on the eventual goal for these
two libraries.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > It would definitely be of interest!  (IMO, it would
need to
> > > > > > > > handle internationalization and localization - I'd
like to keep Trinidad
> > > > > > > > consistent in this regard.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just a quick prompt to see if there is interest
in such a feature.  We may
> > > > > > > > > have capacity to contribute.  I see this being
rendered in 'inaccessible'
> > > > > > > > > mode only, perhaps instead of the window'ed calendar
- thoughts.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ernst.  We're really trying not to
stray from Trinidad as a core
> > > > > > > > > > library.  However, I do like the look of
the Tomahawk version, so that
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > make a very good start.  I guess I'm looking
for guidance as to where
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > would fit and how it would be configured
- and indeed if people think
> > > > > > > > > > Trinidad needs one!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst Fastl <ernst.fastl@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > There is a calendar with a JS-Popup
mode in the tomahawk-component
> > > > > > > > > > > library.
> > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at:
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf
> > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you can use this one, or at least
if you want to implement
> > > > > > > > > > > something
> > > > > > > > > > > similar in trinidad learn from this
one.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ernst
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Would there be interest in a 3rd
calendar mode whereby it popsup a
> > > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript calendar, rather than
just the inline and windowed
> > > > > > > > > > > versions?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If so, is there one out there
that people would like to see as the
> > > > > > > > > > > basis on
> > > > > > > > > > > > which to build?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Danny
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > futher stuff:
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > futher stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> futher stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Mime
View raw message