Mailing-List: contact accumulo-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: accumulo-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <1182537943.225136.1332179907451.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov>
References: 
 <199737055.224777.1332176326567.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov>
 <CADczPYQ=BpnwLj4A-fsJeWWvA0ShC+8NG4z_qT1wE8pf8uX40Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1182537943.225136.1332179907451.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov>
From: John Vines <john.w.vines@ugov.gov>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:42:09 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CADczPYSfi0LMjnoSHvETU5PDfqqBinduzZCcfG8DaXwYBTD_mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Maven Artifacts for 1.3.5 missing?
To: accumulo-user@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043894adb2d9b404bb9ceba1

--f46d043894adb2d9b404bb9ceba1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

We're attempting to release 1.4.0, so I would consider it stable for use.
The thrift APIs have not changed much, if at all. But we maintain at least
one version of backwards compatibility for the client api, so you should
easily be able to get 1.3.x code to work against 1.4.0.

John

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Robert Vesse <rvesse@yarcdata.com> wrote:

>  Is the 1.4.0 branch considered stable enough for use?  And is it the API
> compatible between 1.3.5 and 1.4.0 or do both the database and the client
> need to be on the exact same version for communication to work correctly?
>
>  Rob
>
>  On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:06 AM, John Vines wrote:
>
> I believe we don't have them distributed because our poms do not include
> adequate licensing info for us to publicly release them. 1.4.0 should be
> released when we release it though.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Robert Vesse <rvesse@yarcdata.com>wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason why Maven artifacts for 1.3.5 are not available in the
>> Apache repositories?
>>
>> Which Maven repositories (if any) are they available in?
>>
>> Rob
>>
>
>
>

--f46d043894adb2d9b404bb9ceba1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We&#39;re attempting to release 1.4.0, so I would consider it stable for us=
e. The thrift APIs have not changed much, if at all. But we maintain at lea=
st one version of backwards compatibility for the client api, so you should=
 easily be able to get 1.3.x code to work against 1.4.0.<br>

<br>John<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:58 PM,=
 Robert Vesse <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rvesse@yarcdata.com">=
rvesse@yarcdata.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=
>


<div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">
<div>Is the 1.4.0 branch considered stable enough for use? =A0And is it the=
 API compatible between 1.3.5 and 1.4.0 or do both the database and the cli=
ent need to be on the exact same version for communication to work correctl=
y?</div>


<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rob</div><div><div class=3D"h5">
<br>
<div>
<div>On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:06 AM, John Vines wrote:</div>
<br>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">I believe we don&#39;t have them distributed beca=
use our poms do not include adequate licensing info for us to publicly rele=
ase them. 1.4.0 should be released when we release it though.<br>
<br>
John<br>
<br>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Robert Vesse <=
span dir=3D"ltr">
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rvesse@yarcdata.com" target=3D"_blank">rvesse@yarcdat=
a.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Is there a reason why Maven artifacts for 1.3.5 are not available in the Ap=
ache repositories?<br>
<br>
Which Maven repositories (if any) are they available in?<br>
<br>
Rob<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br>

--f46d043894adb2d9b404bb9ceba1--