Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09549926A for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90190 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 22:18:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90110 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 22:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact accumulo-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: accumulo-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list accumulo-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90102 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 22:18:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:18:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of david.medinets@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:18:16 +0000 Received: by dake40 with SMTP id e40so496020dak.6 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:17:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7+n33WK0XOMrzGidsJeeu1zFKKVmt/5Vz9Agu5R6SVs=; b=fBmYAsKnMg4bL1AixaNEIuj7MumuId3JiMPc3I/NZE7aZZ91K3LGmb5D3H0TIRsreJ Fnz9s4yrdtkUGxaUklGWEExQPqbhDEjhnKt9dOwOMiMfeAwIjTQ0AkC27rM8jL0lgDay 8+wxkvhmxldasQ5GiF0UJQWbbf8cLKP3bgGOc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.74.233 with SMTP id x9mr9198412pbv.74.1325801876478; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.41.228 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:17:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:17:56 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Authorizations vs Column Visibility in FileCount example From: David Medinets To: accumulo-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 README.dirlist has the following command line: ./bin/accumulo org.apache.accumulo.examples.dirlist.FileCount instance zookeepers username password dirTable exampleVis exampleVis The last two parameters are Authorizations and ColumnVisibility. The README file should probably mention this. Also I feel that a short discussion of these two concepts would not be out of place inside this README file. I'd especially like to have the example extended (or replaced) so that the two values are different to allow new users (like me!) to more easily understand how the two concepts interact with each other. My understanding is that ColumnVisibility is associated with the data. While Authorization is associated with the user. The discussion could be as short as that. It would just act as a reminder to the reader. Upon furher reflection, perhaps a README.security makes sense so that concrete examples of these concepts can be given. Then the README.dirlist can point to the README.security. I'm looking at the README files in alphabetic order. I think this is the first time that both Authorizations and ColumnVisibility are used on one command line.