From user-return-846-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@impala.apache.org Wed May 16 18:26:28 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BC00180669 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 18:26:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 22850 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2018 16:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@impala.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@impala.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@impala.apache.org Received: (qmail 22838 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2018 16:26:27 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:26:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E8237C00CC for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:26:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2JgBqaWO3Oc3 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f47.google.com (mail-vk0-f47.google.com [209.85.213.47]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B56965F2C2 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e67-v6so877440vke.7 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 09:26:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=32bmtx5wlMKmPcDOZhPxlrYqemrgGcELlaWFMT/oN2g=; b=sDaP0M1gyi2fJ00zsJEs5f+gRjETZoc6waQGFXFZ9T0KizY2pCbMDcIqt6L3GHpgjc UMFY0zsI6whz9mHHw/6cPB5bwKCiG61bDjWIQHzweWVmztiIRzHlv4/mXB+khM/2YWzC DtJ5toTYZtY6DMlAYn7MrwYZUVb0+FgYbgQke29offeZfZCK7sOMuJudR7rPG+/PQ0ec V8jVS+GXcmViTPacVLq3qu59//3gaOv5szJKnMNvwjSX5Dno/zRA18C7vu0J43TC5K0p cCkePyVt5+FfxhbuIy5IEQG6hK1XePXmOdm+1BaLzQX4DtSReXFUepbhr/Ii3j4LxgAI SYQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=32bmtx5wlMKmPcDOZhPxlrYqemrgGcELlaWFMT/oN2g=; b=jONNPqLcLQH54/YKj37HLQCgBhzatpwqZ0/qFG7mlY22dM1G31AqWyN8yo4ugOvG/X cVhbTUX1TSXLmpgSXbm4inWfGqYk4jqiZsw++piUgb32q34rOgtdKELmo6LPfagdZSlj qtkHLkZ9jptCsjmNCP8S3tt/dUe+7WlrSMBoB1EAGA54sWLyXVwhIJN7VlkaNRXb9n15 M3/Gf0p5xEbGyizRSM+NzljWsHarWb1EE1ZglzTsGj+Qcw0l8hoNggXid1mT4x6YnN9t mnyFk/BD2i6HZTHr/wgjjGVeK3gsIVI8PQklBj6GBVTq2woAUeAB8ai+RyDBvISIHmQA TGKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdBywL8kMK/f90gHFjLgKs/6Jd69sFmNpG3arm3wvzWyeBT1hub VIAh2qLigN8hdKep8gUUyraY4rZaNOKxOP7QFWAEtA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoERtHdLZ/JHAipqblY/6XjFq4dPjPUdJlKdSF7sbpPQdlfof1wcTzVZaZW1sn7M9Zc17MrjnoXS6EQDhtQ2k8= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:b09:: with SMTP id 9-v6mr1350465vkl.17.1526487978466; Wed, 16 May 2018 09:26:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.55.193 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2018 09:26:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jeszy Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 18:26:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Schema read issue To: user@impala.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hey Fawze, This is expected to work seamlessly (although that's a pretty big upgrade). Do the logs report any issues? Does comparing the schemas of the before/after upgrade-written files using 'parquet-tools schema ' show any differences? Thanks! On 16 May 2018 at 12:47, Fawze Abujaber wrote: > Hello Community, > > We are running in schema read issue after upgrading Impala from 2.3 to 2.10 > using Cloudera CDH 5.13.0 > > > Our tables have alot of struct and arrays and after the upgrade all the > historical data at arrays and structs shown as NULL while the new written > data are shown correctly. > > Is it a known issue? or there was any action that i should care about before > i upgrade? > > > > -- > Take Care > Fawze Abujaber