impala-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Hecht (Code Review)" <>
Subject [Impala-ASF-CR] IMPALA-5664: Unix time to timestamp conversions may crash Impala
Date Fri, 06 Oct 2017 17:27:05 GMT
Dan Hecht has posted comments on this change. ( )

Change subject: IMPALA-5664: Unix time to timestamp conversions may crash Impala

Patch Set 11:

File be/src/exprs/
PS11, Line 277:   }
> They are exercised by different parts of be/exprs/ .I have sear
I mean the warning messages that you're adding here have no verification.
File be/src/runtime/
PS11, Line 670: *
> I can change this, but I prefer it this way actually. What is the rule, sho
Yes, we should follow the style guide so we have a consistent style, which overall makes the
code more readable.  I'm sure everyone has something that they dislike about the style, but
we need consistency.
File be/src/runtime/timestamp-value.h:
PS11, Line 43: 9999
> This comment was just wrong, we state <= 9999-12-31 or <10000-01-01 everywh
Okay, thanks for confirming.
File be/src/runtime/
PS11, Line 116: (
> Done
still not fixed:
if (HasDate()...

To view, visit
To unsubscribe, visit

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I77b2f6284d3a597f57e61c17a67c959eff9e38ff
Gerrit-Change-Number: 7954
Gerrit-PatchSet: 11
Gerrit-Owner: Csaba Ringhofer <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Csaba Ringhofer <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Hecht <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lars Volker <>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 17:27:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 8-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message