impala-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sailesh Mukil <sail...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Protocol with re: to reverting previous patches
Date Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:20:18 GMT
Yes, that's how I've usually done it.

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:16 PM, David Knupp <dknupp@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Seems like a silly question, but I just want to make sure I do this right.
>
> IMPALA-6239 was filed because the patch for IMPALA-6068 introduced a
> regression. As a result, the patch was reverted:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-impala/commit/d1c9510
>
> Presumably, I should now just resolve IMPALA-6239 and reopen
> IMPALA-6068with a pointer to the reverted commit?
>
> --
> David Knupp | Software Engineer
> Cloudera Inc., 433 California Street #1100. San Francisco, CA 94104
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=433+California+Street+%231100.+San+Francisco,+CA+94104&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=si
> glink&utm_campaign=reach>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message