impala-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: IMPALA-5315: Allowing Lazy date/month in timestamp (YYYY-M-D)
Date Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:13:38 GMT
I do not think we should. I think the ambiguities this introduces and
then "solves" will make it harder for users to understand what we did
with dates like 35-1-2, or, even worse: 1-2-3 4:5:6

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Vincent Tran <vttran@cloudera.com> wrote:
> The ask in this issue seems kind of specific and contained. But should we
> expand to cover lazy year and lazy time as well?
>
> i.e.
> 90-9-28
> or,
> 90-9-28 1:20:5

Mime
View raw message