Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589DF200BAE for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 57424160AE4; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EFAB160ACA for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:52:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2388 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2016 16:52:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@impala.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@impala.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@impala.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2372 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2016 16:52:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0EE1F180601 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.021 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cki37HDoPjdJ for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 901C95F4EB for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n67so126443107wme.1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:52:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KfAPAgIgG3io72zxqYR+ZUODMBOpzKDq+ex8kAfn9ys=; b=YcENlEeM3EJcffF6kwsC5PzZXmnDeFUICrLMRndoIEIFdCc0O+fQlZ6GLsCsyU8TRK KtMl1H0sGi2ntzCrXdvl6n0NdoPdQw41AvXVMWulqr9gEb8bmjjexhJDESxwccD9i4WQ d85rLFgnINFhukgKauP41WDa5bN/q5vjEyD4n4dRg1JpqmMCg2JA1X2Qc+s1OSg1WNuZ dLRxIwT5YwfwkgpuivWNxpmpS2sHzB6q319V9WQ4OrXnQgx+kzFpNotsZ5BZZN9zNnrq DARik7Gc6w+g2g2b8cTf2nMIg2RA7tBSJ7evD+8nHhIfw7lxP0xTuDdTH2o2WUczIq/s B9FQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KfAPAgIgG3io72zxqYR+ZUODMBOpzKDq+ex8kAfn9ys=; b=hqmdAL7mHnj8hog3KRh3+45UBHQsoXGp2AAbjKiQBOy7fNRnXOPRZRU/ddw8Czng67 dS6C9K3CGJ1/Y2ZnFe9QFgdtPIDMPLKbknx0R/S1C7vfXxeDJC7ebwjOeLf9qDuFb0/5 jejuMkQDNJ02Y+2esEoL1nIrc/MXfkZeP7nvlk5SlOxVZkJHlMU0gutie4fdTIPin6wO GDgWYiF09jpd6fvCGzZCioo68iOFE+9g7/S6nD0SFUGMwURQou4Uk4bDl61L4sOj91mb JhX81ac8MPTelIAXAfbIZSrLqyfnpmA0ikT0hjYinnQQOBJP5JbdpwWJ1jIC+5BV25Oz uqig== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfiDHB34SiJLhQVZIgX6TFMwg5QZI1r7Cz9qT1uhyl1Ew6D7zge+HRx4fXhioICMEtaKxAqMROn3E16s0hS X-Received: by 10.28.74.15 with SMTP id x15mr3520653wma.31.1477673547895; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:52:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.16.6 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:51:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Apple Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:51:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Ideas for organizing 3.0 To: "dev@impala" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:37 -0000 The most recent release was 2.7.0. We have 32 issues that we might want to tackle for 3.0: https://issues.cloudera.org/issues/?filter=11830 Does anyone have any thoughts about how to organize this? For instance we might decide: 0. Starting immediately, the community is encouraged to submit issues that would break compatibility. Detailed designs are also encouraged. 1. After 2.9.0, commits that break compatibility will be allowed in the "master" branch. 2. After 2.9.0 a call will go out for anyone who wants to get a compatibility-breaking patch in that they have 3 months to do so. 3. After three months, we'll cut a new release candidate and bump all JIRA issues that would break compatibility to Target Version: Impala 4.0 Thoughts?