Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D6C200B3E for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:07:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B07B9160AC1; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 21:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 01C03160ABF for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:07:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37212 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2016 21:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@impala.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@impala.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@impala.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37200 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2016 21:07:08 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:07:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7D0C0C6FA5 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 21:07:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.721 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQI5NBKfazVi for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 21:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 046235F5A1 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 21:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 1so54563210wmz.1 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RTP01fwtJNVUS0u0RQjGBZLX+qW6DURuSJBuRpxKtEI=; b=cYtO0zzNYKX3/kZIPjkGkXM1IltMT7J65W8g+LGJA84NCQAkEe8OVycuD5aWYrRkYI gX7xJm6nK90tfvzidctFCngpB1L8AqHkGvYPPZsNc6TbIlgYPn6g0rTAs5hwY6/QHhEX CAl0epEUOW58YyAR2R7zIicN9hX9E14SRxvgrO2a2xDgy4OfapeRViyT1mMjeLxAjpQM rONCH4s7/pJYyFC9FVJ4BAU5Wapo6uSVOT/G2euWAXEcALQjfiZ94TI9+YUJkIAcNiG4 iueI9sF5auMt+9tMkViDaWLozX4PHGgEjMdWREloLesfcOH9EeIMAi2ntDEq0huCiD6T Vw9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RTP01fwtJNVUS0u0RQjGBZLX+qW6DURuSJBuRpxKtEI=; b=Wvb7kpjGSf27Vt+vPvnDIMfkPvLJtPnDqGWmSb0/Mza2bl5vDYLdZSIRuYNyPYD8G+ sc8AaFkCWK2eblmuhKz+jihIMB/7eHvM8fhiw99Ve+al6tVCfytS52PV2LpYwkVdCTOf 6+flVDlOmtoiUFet+tOmOxmIPgD4ThrKxSXYJ20IpoUaYppslEaCMlZoqgv/9Enc9a0i uRSVEBuqevf8d3TuEUhwu7ONj2C15vN4vn0ZWVsUGuJJqCcBZhCiXP0BU9Q2PTNzsVMh 6087hkcBs9wmNp1sjIlEP46hVd4HYhksq8IGBZEh7wKitb1uxd1WK7+EwaNGq0N7OFqh /xVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOdlhMafD2a7cdFZQ060YGtmeJyNg4nUMGI+ajBAymsgjOqVJZqz4swmkF3FBkEgVAzDeF3SInXgbKGyfnJ X-Received: by 10.28.111.198 with SMTP id c67mr5452485wmi.34.1473282425619; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:07:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.58.80 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:06:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Apple Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:06:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: How PMC members are supposed to enforce release policy? To: Tom White , Todd Lipcon , Carl Steinbach , Brock Noland Cc: "dev@impala" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:07:10 -0000 Dear mentors, The release policy says that PMC members, before +1ing a release candidate, must "verify[ing] that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases". Does that imply that PMC members need to be familiar with (and check for) the rules on http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html in every RC tarball?