ignite-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Blog post "Introduction to the Apache(R) Ignite™ community structure"
Date Thu, 21 Mar 2019 12:34:51 GMT
Sorry for the late reply. Contributors are not ranked so weight is not
measured. The community always prefer to build consensus. If consensus is
not reached (this happens time-to-time), then feature or change should not
appear in the product.

By the way, Apache PMCs may veto changes with a technical justification
explaining why change is bad.

A final word in project development has PMC (it is a committee consisting
of all its members). Practically Apache Ignite Community prefers wider
consensus - from all contributors.

In case something is going wrong, there is our last resort:
https://www.apache.org/board/escalation  But I don't remember any

Priority of implementing features is solved in another way: if someone
wants to implement something and the community does not reject it, so why
not? There is no single priority for all contributors.

ср, 17 окт. 2018 г. в 12:09, zaleslaw <zaleslaw.sin@gmail.com>:

> [For discussion] It's interesting to know more about possible conflicts:
> when
> a few persons are involved in contribution as a commiters, for example, and
> they have different opinions about next steps in roadmap implementation or
> about certain feature. How to measure correctly their weights? One of them
> doing small bug fixes, another does large features. They are not ranked,
> except amount of commits or code lines in github. Who can say last word?
> Imagine, only they are both understand something in this feature and its
> priority. Votes couldn't help, right? How they should solve their conflict?
> Does you have any cases in your experience?
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

View raw message