Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EC4200D37 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E0E8C160BEF; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 22:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A4871609C8 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 24540 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2017 22:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 24531 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2017 22:36:06 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 22:36:06 +0000 Received: from [192.168.75.66] (c-67-160-238-197.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.160.238.197]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id F40B31A0048 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Denis Magda Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Ignite Affinity Latency Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:36:05 -0800 References: <1510121091154-0.post@n6.nabble.com> To: user@ignite.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1510121091154-0.post@n6.nabble.com> Message-Id: <74EEA7EE-6179-426A-81D6-CB160771BF07@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) archived-at: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 22:36:08 -0000 Hi, What kind of logic you run inside of the affinity-based computation and = how many computations do you have running in parallel? =E2=80=94 Denis > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:04 PM, rajivgandhi = wrote: >=20 > Hi, > We are seeing higher latency form ignite affinity (single key)/compute > (multiple keys) of 7ms compared to get/getall 700 microseconds. >=20 > Is this as expected? Our implementation is based on the below = examples: > = https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/examples/src/main/java/org/ap= ache/ignite/examples/datagrid/CacheAffinityExample.java >=20 > thanks & Regards, > Rajeev >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/