Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDAB200D3D for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DE397160BF3; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 56D1D160BE4 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 68639 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2017 12:18:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 68629 invoked by uid 99); 13 Nov 2017 12:18:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A06F4C1BED for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.172 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPrlfpjSFoWh for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n6.nabble.com (n6.nabble.com [162.255.23.37]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A1F905FBF6 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n6.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n6.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DC52D6BC8C for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:18:14 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:18:14 -0700 (MST) From: luqmanahmad To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1510575494287-0.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <590D481E-05E9-4F2F-845B-B3883EA38E61@gridgain.com> References: <1510573819480-0.post@n6.nabble.com> <590D481E-05E9-4F2F-845B-B3883EA38E61@gridgain.com> Subject: Re: Computation best practices MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:18 -0000 Hi Christos, Thanks for getting back to me. There is no specific need for it - I am just trying to get my head around for the best practices in that case data nodes does make sense to me to perform the computation. To be honest just a bit confused with the Cluster groups and trying to find a use case for it (apart from collecting metrics and broadcasting). Cluster API does make sense and already using it but then stuck with groups where it can be useful or maybe I am thinking too much :) Thanks, Luqman -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/