Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A72200CD7 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 172081679DB; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D03F1679D9 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:55:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 65933 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2017 17:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 65923 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2017 17:55:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:55:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CF091180256 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:55:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.173 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OBRt790UaOzi for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 250465F6BE for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3120582C966D for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:55:14 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:55:14 -0700 (MST) From: "slava.koptilin" To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1501610114855-15867.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <6043bd3f00fa4a94b5681fe67aea3f48@unitedplanet.com> References: <6043bd3f00fa4a94b5681fe67aea3f48@unitedplanet.com> Subject: Re: Cache Groups and PARTITIONED/REPLICATED MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:55:18 -0000 Hi Juan, > the returned set is always null. As soon as an empty configuration is > passed, the set seems to work again. Is this the intended behavior? Yes, this is the intended behavior. Ignite#set() method returns a named set from cache and create one if it has not been created yet and CollectionConfiguration is not null [1]. >Should from 2.1.0 onwards caches/sets with different requirements be stored in different cache groups? Yes, distributed Sets/Queues within the same group must have the same cache mode, affinity function and so on. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Cache-Groups-and-PARTITIONED-REPLICATED-tp15853p15867.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.