Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBAD200CCB for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:29:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 89D8916BCC3; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0162516BCC2 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:29:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88663 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2017 18:29:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 88653 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2017 18:29:19 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:29:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 61EB3C358E for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:29:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.174 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbRIPdjBmDdq for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id DE5C85F36E for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5125499F60B for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:29:08 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:29:08 -0700 (MST) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1500575348619-15194.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1500560429634-15178.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1500474516599-15123.post@n6.nabble.com> <1500480555195-15132.post@n6.nabble.com> <1500539932242-15167.post@n6.nabble.com> <1500550215586-15173.post@n6.nabble.com> <1500560429634-15178.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Ignite2.0 Affinity Key Distribution MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:29:25 -0000 Ajay, To get better distribution you should have more partitions. Ideally, number of partitions should be at least order of magnitude bigger than number of nodes. I also recommend to use power of 2 as number of partitions (128, 256, 512, ...). Default value is 1024 and it works fine in majority of cases. Why do you change it in the first place? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite2-0-Affinity-Key-Distribution-tp15123p15194.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.