ignite-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sasha Belyak <rtsfo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Write Behind with delete performance
Date Thu, 11 May 2017 04:02:06 GMT
Yes, if key wasn't flushed (end event wasn't collected by flusher thread to
flush) - it will be just overwritten in memory with new value (doesn't
matter what operation, i.e. insert can be overwritten to delete or visa
So in your example if WB cache get
insert k1 =0, k2=2, k3 =3 and delete k1=0
and don't start flush between these operations - it eventually write to
deleteAll( k1=0 ), writeAll( k2=2, k3=3 ).
Of course, WB cache must process deleteAll ( k1=0 ) because it can't know
if the k1 key already be in store before our example.
You can read about it in

2017-05-11 0:24 GMT+07:00 waterg <jessie.jianwei.lin@gmail.com>:

> Thank you for the quick explaining and creating jira tickets.
> Just a thought:
> If insert k1 =0, k2=2, k3 =3 and delete k1=0 and k1 is not being flushed to
> store yet, would it be possible to just delete in memory, w/o flushing to
> store? and deleteAll for all k1 like records that have been flushed to
> store?
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/Write-Behind-with-delete-
> performance-tp12580p12604.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message