Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC051200C61 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:45:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id EA883160BB3; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 391B5160B9E for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:45:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 67832 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2017 09:45:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 67821 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2017 09:45:15 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A3817C01DB for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.424 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.424 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TF1mHIsh55QH for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 38CD060DF0 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0FB3C957F92 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:45:11 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:45:11 -0700 (MST) From: "tuco.ramirez" To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1493113511562-12229.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1492156044890-11975.post@n6.nabble.com> <1492420744125-11992.post@n6.nabble.com> <1492452420971-12005.post@n6.nabble.com> <1492498926925-12012.post@n6.nabble.com> <1493111931760-12226.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Basic question on scaling of reads with ignite sql queries MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:17 -0000 Thanks Andrew, A follow up question, if i have 4 machines comprising a cluster of a distributed cache with backups set as 1, will 2 machines be master and 2 be slaves, or each machine will hold the 1/4th data of master data and 1/4th of slave data of another master. If it is former, then we reading from slaves will increase the throughput as the queries on master nodes will reduce. Thanks Tuco -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Basic-question-on-scaling-of-reads-with-ignite-sql-queries-tp11975p12229.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.