Return-Path: <user-return-10531-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@ignite.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183])
	by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE5F200C49
	for <archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:37:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix)
	id E9286160B80; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:37:04 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C040160B6D
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:37:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 2528 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2017 15:36:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@ignite.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@ignite.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@ignite.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.ignite.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2519 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2017 15:36:58 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:36:58 +0000
Received: from mail-ot0-f175.google.com (mail-ot0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175])
	by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 36F861A0193
	for <user@ignite.apache.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:36:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x37so95410535ota.2
        for <user@ignite.apache.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0S//DGkx0yvn/iaUo4ZIX84kErcOhfMdn9JZbpwsq3oEq/MGN2pSEfpQJ1jS/ymybKDYH8K9HiRmCmCxPN
X-Received: by 10.107.159.69 with SMTP id i66mr14842149ioe.143.1489765017413;
 Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.36.202 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1489763845901-11285.post@n6.nabble.com>
References: <1489696124205-11252.post@n6.nabble.com> <CAP3QaUGN55Bcr3d=d1uf1zGu=zpSe3n5c=X4pb1iHeo9gyE=UA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1489763845901-11285.post@n6.nabble.com>
From: Nikolai Tikhonov <ntikhonov@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:36:57 +0300
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAP3QaUF5mG=UHrUiUiH=GvumczSAUh4rfHPqVTd5KpRZxEZoZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAP3QaUF5mG=UHrUiUiH=GvumczSAUh4rfHPqVTd5KpRZxEZoZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: destroy and offheap memory
To: user@ignite.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141c6dea9a9f0054aeef2b4
archived-at: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:37:05 -0000

--001a1141c6dea9a9f0054aeef2b4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Could you show this behaviour on example? Which utils did you use for
analyzing virtual memory state? How many time passed beetwen 4 and 5 steps?

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:17 PM, lawrencefinn <larryf@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's fair but why doesn't the process's memory go down by what I expect?
> Scenario:
> 1.  Measure memory of process (A)
> 2.  Load offheap cache
> 3.  Measure memory of process (B)
> 4.  Destroy cache
> 5.  Measure memory of process(C)
>
> I would assume that C=A, that is the memory should return back to the
> original state.  But this is not what happens.  The heap used and committed
> stays pretty constant throughout this process.  Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/destroy-and-offheap-memory-tp11252p11285.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--001a1141c6dea9a9f0054aeef2b4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Could you show this behaviour on example? Which utils did =
you use for analyzing virtual memory state? How many time passed beetwen 4 =
and 5 steps?</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"=
>On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:17 PM, lawrencefinn <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:larryf@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">larryf@gmail.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">That&#39;s fair but why doesn=
&#39;t the process&#39;s memory go down by what I expect?<br>
Scenario:<br>
1.=C2=A0 Measure memory of process (A)<br>
2.=C2=A0 Load offheap cache<br>
3.=C2=A0 Measure memory of process (B)<br>
4.=C2=A0 Destroy cache<br>
5.=C2=A0 Measure memory of process(C)<br>
<br>
I would assume that C=3DA, that is the memory should return back to the<br>
original state.=C2=A0 But this is not what happens.=C2=A0 The heap used and=
 committed<br>
stays pretty constant throughout this process.=C2=A0 Any thoughts?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href=3D"http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x=
6.nabble.com/destroy-and-offheap-memory-tp11252p11285.html" rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">http://apache-ignite-users.<wbr>70518.x6.nabble.com/d=
estroy-<wbr>and-offheap-memory-<wbr>tp11252p11285.html</a><br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">Sent from the Apache Ignite Users m=
ailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1141c6dea9a9f0054aeef2b4--