Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACE2200C46 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:20:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A95E1160B95; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 02B47160B7C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:20:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88544 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2017 10:20:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 88535 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2017 10:20:12 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:20:12 +0000 Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id BFCFD1A04D1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f11so8489637qkb.0 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:20:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2ZlIKDfBacduvwHKJPB4Xb4gUH8MlY3knP1Fvh8Ttoy+EBuYCKq9nz30DyTLkd2ebmsVLGi3K1JNhsSoh1 X-Received: by 10.55.131.2 with SMTP id f2mr32573529qkd.227.1490782810838; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.233.235.72 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1490184085418-11362.post@n6.nabble.com> <1490257405075-11386.post@n6.nabble.com> <1490598490780-11455.post@n6.nabble.com> <1490683773230-11485.post@n6.nabble.com> <1490709739591-11501.post@n6.nabble.com> From: Alexey Kuznetsov Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:20:10 +0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GridCachePartitionExchangeManager] Pending transaction deadlock detection futures To: user@ignite.apache.org Cc: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c072e24e0b293054bdbeb3e archived-at: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:20:13 -0000 --94eb2c072e24e0b293054bdbeb3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Val, >> Does anyone have an idea why client mode in Visor affects behavior? I thought we already forced client mode there, no? Visor CMD was NOT reworked to client mode. So Visor CMD starts server node in daemon mode. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote: > cross-posting to dev list. > > Guys, > > Does anyone have an idea why client mode in Visor affects behavior? I > thought we already forced client mode there, no? > > Alexey, you should know the answer. Can you please take a look at this > thread? > > -Val > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:02 AM, ght230 wrote: > >> Yes,I use custom build. >> >> Today I tried to set Ignition.setClientMode(true) for command "open" of >> the >> visorcmd. >> >> It seems the visorcmd will not stuck the whole cluster again. >> >> Is there anything wrong in "ClientMode" of the visorcmd? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705 >> 18.x6.nabble.com/GridCachePartitionExchangeManager-Pending-t >> ransaction-deadlock-detection-futures-tp11362p11501.html >> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- Alexey Kuznetsov --94eb2c072e24e0b293054bdbeb3e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Val,

&= gt;> Does anyone have an idea why client mode in Visor affects behavior?= I thought we already forced client mode there, no?
Visor CMD was NOT=C2=A0reworked to client mode.
So V= isor CMD starts server node in daemon mode.

--94eb2c072e24e0b293054bdbeb3e--