Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB274200C53 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B9C9F160B99; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 318F3160B85 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 29456 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2017 22:58:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 29441 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2017 22:58:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:58:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D3499C0301 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:58:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.173 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fF_gS0lKMHAS for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 028C85FACC for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714443FCDD42 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:06 -0700 (MST) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1490655486030-11481.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: What is the best approach for large number of concurrent mappings? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:58:10 -0000 Hi, Can you please clarify what you mean by continuous mapper here? Actually, your use case sounds similar to one implemented in the WordCount example provided with Ignite: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/examples/streaming/wordcount -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-approach-for-large-number-of-concurrent-mappings-tp11445p11481.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.