Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9315C200BEC for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 08:23:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 91A61160B2D; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 07:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DCFE160B15 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 08:23:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 98684 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2016 07:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 98674 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2016 07:23:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 07:23:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BFC35C08A1 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 07:23:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.173 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YRoRwtBWvdf for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 07:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 063B85F1AE for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 07:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9A6392395C for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:07:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:22:24 -0700 (MST) From: rishi007bansod To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1482996144126-9793.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Scan query vs Sql query MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 07:23:02 -0000 From performance point of view which type of query is better? When should we use scan query and when should we use sql query? -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Scan-query-vs-Sql-query-tp9793.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.