Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1089200BD4 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:40:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CFA02160B0B; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F49160B05 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:40:14 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 41696 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2016 22:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 41686 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2016 22:40:14 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:40:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DAB8ECCC5F for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:40:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.174 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwgvqfBkWzbX for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2E31B5F5F8 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C197390DAE9 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:40:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:40:10 -0700 (MST) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1480632010333-9341.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1480604472776-9332.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1480604472776-9332.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Failed to process message: Creating partition which does not belong to local node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:40:16 -0000 Hi Yuci, Basically, this error means that affinity function on node A gave node B as a primary node for a key. Node A than sent a request to node B, but affinity on node B doesn't think that this key belong locally. In other words, affinity function worked inconsistently on different nodes. Usually this is caused by incorrect hashCode() implementation of the key class (as pointed out in the message). Unfortunately, the key itself is not printed out, so I would recommend to put a breakpoint and go back through the trace to see for which key the partition number is calculated incorrectly. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-process-message-Creating-partition-which-does-not-belong-to-local-node-tp9332p9341.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.