Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D46200BC5 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:20:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A06E8160B0C; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BFDA160AF1 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 64649 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2016 20:20:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 64639 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2016 20:20:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:20:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C1933C036D for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:20:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.174 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taMZoZpNYO6B for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7E5FF5F36D for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD60368343C for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:09:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:19:56 -0700 (MST) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1479845996164-9134.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Blocked get operation problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:20:36 -0000 Hi, Yes, Ignite acquires a short-time Java-level lock on entry each time you access it (either read or write). However, any concurrent updates or reads of different will not interfere with each other. Why do you think this is causing a performance issue? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Blocked-get-operation-problem-tp9133p9134.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.