Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F121200BBB for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:58:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8D909160B01; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 08722160AF6 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:58:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 90976 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2016 13:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 90966 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2016 13:58:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:58:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BC3BACC17C for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:58:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.174 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgUlJ7pDaPtA for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 622145F1F3 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.37.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.37]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7E535AF895 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:48:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:58:00 -0700 (MST) From: vdpyatkov To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1478786280034-8877.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1478641173997-8790.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1478578785846-8759.post@n6.nabble.com> <1478641173997-8790.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: What's the difference between EntryProcessor and distributed closure? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:58:12 -0000 Hi Tracyl, You can use "invoke", the method will be most effective for retrieve part of value from cache. For the withKeepBinary off_heap cache "invoke" takes lock on entry and can to manipulate with off_heap pointer wrapped on BinaryObject. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/What-s-the-difference-between-EntryProcessor-and-distributed-closure-tp8759p8877.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.