Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D23200BAE for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:22:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7871A160AE3; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BD9CB160ADD for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:22:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 68715 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2016 12:22:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 68706 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2016 12:22:39 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:22:39 +0000 Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (mail-qk0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 8038F1A0055 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o68so83968904qkf.3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:22:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdPKwnNgWLakSwNdWFzOkdtKoQbbeKUSat+RBKUlls84wrUiTogahHDTJU85Dl2zVnSde2UZu3bdIFtsg== X-Received: by 10.55.19.97 with SMTP id d94mr12247328qkh.200.1477657358266; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:22:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.62.152 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:22:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1477600040424-8567.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1477600040424-8567.post@n6.nabble.com> From: Kristian Rosenvold Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:22:37 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does read-through work with replicated caches ? To: user@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114009c0f09f43053febe918 archived-at: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:22:41 -0000 --001a114009c0f09f43053febe918 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ok, I understand the bit about the split. So instead of a cluster I now have a bunch of individual nodes all thinking they are the center of the known universe. But why don't they read-through to the database for non-existing data ? (I can understand that the node would avoid read-through for data it already believes to be in-memory) Kristian 2016-10-27 22:27 GMT+02:00 vkulichenko : > Ignite doesn't do merge, see my explanation here: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Cluster- > breaks-down-on-network-failure-td8549.html > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users. > 70518.x6.nabble.com/Does-read-through-work-with-replicated- > caches-tp8547p8567.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --001a114009c0f09f43053febe918 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, I understand the bit about the split. So instead of a = cluster I now have a bunch of individual nodes all thinking they are the ce= nter of the known universe. But why don't they read-through to the data= base for non-existing data ? =C2=A0(I can understand that the node would av= oid read-through for data it already believes to be in-memory)


Kristian


2016-10-27 22:27 GMT+02:00 vkuliche= nko <valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com>:
Ignite doesn't do merge, see my explanation here= :
htt= p://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Cluster-breaks-down-o= n-network-failure-td8549.html

-Val



--
View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.7051= 8.x6.nabble.com/Does-read-through-work-with-replicated-caches-tp8= 547p8567.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--001a114009c0f09f43053febe918--