ignite-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Breaking improvements for the Ignite C++.
Date Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:12:57 GMT
I am not a C++ expert, but can you please explain why you would like to
change all methods on the BinaryType to static? Is it the same way in Java?

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:

> Hello Igniters and Ignite users,
> As there is going to be Ignite 2.0 release soon, It is a good opportunity
> for us to improve Ignite C++ API without the need to maintain backward
> compatibility. Let's collect and discuss all the proposal for the changes
> in API here.
> If you've had any proposal on how to improve C++ API but that could break
> backward compatibility, now you can propose that for us to discuss and
> probably include it in Ignite 2.0. So, go ahead and post your proposals
> here.
> Let's create tasks for accepted proposals as subtasks for the task [1] so
> they all could be easy to track.
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3559
> Best Regards,
> Igor

View raw message