Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF52200AF5 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6C825160A3F; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F966160A16 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:11:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 91500 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2016 11:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 91490 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2016 11:11:14 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:11:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4EE4018046E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:11:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.89 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id amJ7s10QXo1F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com [209.85.161.174]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C2B635F24D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o16so46311368ywd.2 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 04:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=3O92ChpgH/XuE85nzL+1R3mdR8rqyPJ8l7kQJ6/feX4=; b=fh6wF3WN9DHF49EQUT6H+4RJ7/TNNWliYTQ9vGRO6WHCpZ5WN70qWuppJexAOanP/S 38V9v5LutJx7qlJ/5zGNeNpFKT495Fnj2jdW7Fmrz/RCsub+e993BNCfgLVhTR+qz4kU tJZO2GmlzbCuP362TsyRpbqsTrhyFrDDOrAFhVwg6moyfGzZLFXIVZgwkbPPxQHq9L57 mENYo4OERLKT0cBIq290CUBC+IKLbtt8dfb7X5ogC1lAuwv5puBjQ4MzKuZ41lRsHLf4 Ef0SHI4YzpatG42dXc5Va4fg13OydU5OIKIeHx/TC9nFQTYhLAkpaYZuZ0CBOO777t5R SmhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=3O92ChpgH/XuE85nzL+1R3mdR8rqyPJ8l7kQJ6/feX4=; b=bcCg9frR3s6JBnyma8pMWNGHL2F9n3cvEXCcJljA3M5XsQ57KWXFOzzKtyjMtZfGkY 8sBlkBjs7mOaOmtJFLhtNO9NaED3sTqZtyD8jlwswPfOBSezHbR8+CnHfCXW6xv1ADSQ 92QZlQ03nqyyDyhGYH/no2cv4jXjgKhJ/j7npHUdFosLt24sceLqeXkOYLO7Aoefe4zd vBJAe/nesOf6aEnSO1ITPKzEpyqfGvvQx4P15YW0cxZQUqL++quAJROEEs+ZXJHyQrhL jYT0XQzj/2pmIIiHhJ62Ft9y0TA9bXzHYU5UVfqTD7mlHiifgL8mJ94B2FO0Evra0wKE 0JSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI3Niz32MwDDi3DvSsQ+N15Bu2ApherD4qf4tr6+UDmI0jjZoLdFyibpzjgRFMq04N7MQziPb6aeB4dqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.86.139 with SMTP id k133mr5321154ywb.96.1464865862803; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 04:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.119.207 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 04:11:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160602163430231274234@neusoft.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:11:02 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: About benchmark and scalability testing From: Vladislav Pyatkov To: user@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11431dbc656568053449a933 archived-at: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:11:16 -0000 --001a11431dbc656568053449a933 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, In addition, banchmarks for Apache Ignite are made using yardstik[1] framework. =D0=A1an be found in the project ignite-yardstick[2] [1]: https://github.com/yardstick-benchmarks [2]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/yardstick On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Alexei Scherbakov < alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Some benchmarks are available on GridGain site: > > > http://www.gridgain.com/resources/benchmarks/ignite-vs-hazelcast-benchmar= ks/ > > I think Ignite can't be fully tested using SQL related benchmarks, becaus= e > Ignite only supports > SELECTs. > > Therefore, I recommend to measure Ignite's performance using your actual > use-case. > > Start from reading Ignite's documentation [1]. > > [1] http://apacheignite.readme.io > > > 2016-06-02 11:34 GMT+03:00 hu-yl@neusoft.com : > >> Hi, >> >> Is there somebody making the performance testing for Ignite? >> Who used the Benchmark Factory=E2=84=A2 or BenchmarkSQL which suppor= ts TPC-C >> to test Ignite? >> >> I want to know how does Ignite compare with mysql or oracle in OLTP. >> >> Or, where can I find the related article? >> >> Any guidance about this would be much appreciated - thanks! >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Bob >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------- >> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any >> accompanying attachment(s) >> is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be >> confidential and/or privileged of >> Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any >> reader of this communication is >> not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, >> storing, disclosure or copying >> is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this >> communication in error,please >> immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original >> message and all copies from >> your system. Thank you. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------- >> > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Alexei Scherbakov > --=20 Vladislav Pyatkov --001a11431dbc656568053449a933 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

In addition, banchmar= ks for Apache Ignite are made using =C2=A0yardstik[1] framework.
= =D0=A1an be found in the project ignite-yardstick[2]=C2=A0
[1]: <= a href=3D"https://github.com/yardstick-benchmarks">https://github.com/yards= tick-benchmarks

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Alexei Scherbakov <alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Some benchmarks = are available on GridGain site:


I think Ignite can't b= e fully tested using SQL related benchmarks, because Ignite only supports
SELECTs.

Therefore, I recommend to measure= Ignite's performance using your actual use-case.

<= div>Start from reading Ignite's documentation [1].

=


2016-06-02 11:3= 4 GMT+03:00 hu-yl@ne= usoft.com <hu-yl@neusoft.com>:
Hi,=C2=A0

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Is there somebody m= aking the=C2=A0performance testing for Ignite?
=C2=A0= =C2=A0 Who used the=C2=A0Benchmark Factory=E2=84=A2 or=C2=A0Benchmark= SQL which supports=C2=A0TPC-C to test Ignite?

=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 I want to know how does Ignite compare with mysql or oracle in OLTP.=

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Or, where can I find th= e related article?

=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0= Any=C2=A0guidance=C2=A0about this would be much appreciated - thanks!=C2=A0

Bob


------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: The information cont= ained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s)
is intended onl= y for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or priv= ileged of
Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. = If any reader of this communication is
not the intended recipient, unau= thorized use, forwarding, printing,=C2=A0 storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this com= munication in error,please
immediately notify the sender by return e-ma= il, and delete the original message and all copies from
your system. Th= ank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------




--

Be= st regards,
Alexei Scherbakov



--
Vladislav Pyatkov
--001a11431dbc656568053449a933--