Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22849200B27 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 06:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 16D6E160A4F; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 04:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 842AB160A36 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 06:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 39276 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2016 04:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 39266 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2016 04:46:28 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 04:46:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 41180C0E26 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 04:46:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.972 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.972 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61HZIJGtVKl2 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 04:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4E0AB5F1BE for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 04:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malf.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.59]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000A429CDD63 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: amitpa To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1465360242889-5507.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1465312885659-5501.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1464884581833-5385.post@n6.nabble.com> <4CCDB1A6-A8C3-4156-B516-346862301CD8@gridgain.com> <1464942653201-5400.post@n6.nabble.com> <922855A6-182E-4684-9A3D-C3462DA26B95@gridgain.com> <1464974817261-5412.post@n6.nabble.com> <1465039341234-5418.post@n6.nabble.com> <1465253566380-5470.post@n6.nabble.com> <1465276926262-5475.post@n6.nabble.com> <1465312885659-5501.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Ignite Write Behind performance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 04:46:30 -0000 We use both. Which ever is faster gets called first .. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Write-Behind-performance-tp5385p5507.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.