Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DC32009F9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D5DB1160A0E; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 51720160A05 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3762 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2016 15:14:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 3750 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2016 15:14:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:14:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1BD0E18058B for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:14:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.173 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHyQLRloy6mN for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4FD760D81 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malf.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.59]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB59B282B97D for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 07:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 07:59:02 -0700 (PDT) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1464015542814-5125.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1464009534854-5112.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1463990969363-5085.post@n6.nabble.com> <1464004991510-5101.post@n6.nabble.com> <1464009534854-5112.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Ignite Transaction performance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:14:18 -0000 There are too many variables to say if this performance is OK or not without having the code. So please provide the test if you want someone in the community to help you. BTW, 1.6 is released, you can try it: ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Transaction-performance-tp5085p5125.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.