Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C61A19295 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8559 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2016 00:38:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 8523 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2016 00:38:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 8511 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2016 00:38:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:38:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CE95FC2171 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:38:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.173 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ijm2br_wQk99 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B06105F246 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malf.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.59]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F13E23BE8D8 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:24:52 -0700 (PDT) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1458865492978-3673.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1457270092348-3377.post@n6.nabble.com> <1458569066250-3605.post@n6.nabble.com> <1458817675995-3664.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Two Ignite Clusters formed after network disturbance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is not completely correct. Ignite also lacks the implementation of GridSegmentationProcessor that actually decides whether a segment is valid or not. The implementation of the processor can be injected into Ignite as a part of a plugin. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Two-Ignite-Clusters-formed-after-network-disturbance-tp3377p3673.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.