Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 756D6188D7 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20249 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2016 19:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 20204 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2016 19:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 20194 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2016 19:28:16 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:28:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E687AC1476 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:28:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.174 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GohKN4mOmWv for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E2340205FA for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malf.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.59]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39051F3265F for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:23:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:16:54 -0800 (PST) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1453835814954-2728.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1453800891724-2719.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1453730766304-2694.post@n6.nabble.com> <1453734495449-2697.post@n6.nabble.com> <1453737424108-2702.post@n6.nabble.com> <1453759046365-2709.post@n6.nabble.com> <1453800891724-2719.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Cross join bug for partitioned caches MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Andrey, I just provided the general rules on how to design the domain model to get correct results for SQL queries. I agree that for cross joins without condition only the second option works. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Cross-join-bug-for-partitioned-caches-tp2694p2728.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.