ignite-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Point to point messaging with Ignite
Date Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:35:41 GMT
Ah, you could also use distributed locks to represent ownership, and events
to get informed when a node leaves, without blocking a thread indefinitely
until the lock is released. There are many possibilities.

*Raúl Kripalani*
PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
Messaging Engineer
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Raul Kripalani <raulk@apache.org> wrote:

> Take into account that Ignite topics, by nature, are a broadcast channel,
> which means that all nodes subscribed to topic XYZ will receive a copy of
> the event.
>
> Having said that, you could synchronise multiple nodes to ensure only a
> single one is subscribed to a given topic at any point in time, by using a
> Distributed CountDown Latch, or some other similar coordination mechanism
> to make potential subscribers compete during a failover.
>
> You do need to think about your QoS and delivery guarantees. If a message
> is sent during a brief period where no nodes are subscribed, the message
> would be lost. Another possibility would be to use an Ignite Queue +
> [Distributed Countdown Latch + Atomic Counter] for coordination. Queues
> would accumulate unconsumed messages until a node takes them.
>
> Or as Valentin said, use the compute API.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> Messaging Engineer
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:11 PM, kcheng.mvp <kcheng.mvp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My use case is below.
>>
>>
>> *Node-A* and *Node-B* would send message with topic 'Topic-Happy'
>>
>> *Node-C* and *Node-D* subscribe this topic 'Topic-Happy'
>>
>>
>> no matter *Node-A* or *Node-B* send a message with topic 'Topic-Happy',
>> *make sure only one node* (Node-C or Node-D) could consume this message
>>
>>
>> How to achieve this? If there is a way, does this way is smart enough for
>> loading balance?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Point-to-point-messaging-with-Ignite-tp1191p2420.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message