Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4864318970 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96239 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2015 19:39:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-user-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 96198 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2015 19:39:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ignite.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ignite.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 96188 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2015 19:39:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:39:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BBA361A0750 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:39:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.174 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKkG62SIjZrN for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTP id 77FD842C69 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malf.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.59]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA36169A739 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT) From: vkulichenko To: user@ignite.apache.org Message-ID: <1443555150013-1519.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1443552175047-1518.post@n6.nabble.com> References: <1443552175047-1518.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Exception during node initialization MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Can you please properly subscribe to the user list so we can get email notifications? You can refer to these instructions for more info: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1 vpasynkova wrote > I have a client node in my multi-node cluster issuing frequent repeated > queries against a partitioned cache. If I attempt to add an additional > node to the cluster while the client is sending these queries, the new > node fails to start up. The problem is that the client's queries get > broadcasted to all nodes in the cluster including the new node before the > new node has had a chance to set up the schema for the partitioned cache > being queried. The new node logs a "schema not found exception" causing > the client's query to fail as well. > > How can I prevent the client from broadcasting the query to this new node > until its setup is completed? SQL queries should automatically handle topology changes. Are you using query API on the client or broadcasting a closure using IgniteCompute? What version of Ignite are you on? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Exception-during-node-initialization-tp1518p1519.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.