ignite-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Btw anyone heard of CQ engine?
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:27:31 GMT
Thanks for the pointers!
The main difficulty at Ignite side is that we need
index data structure to be snapshotable with O(1) complexity and of course
without copying of the whole thing, so I'm not sure if we will be able
to use something from there as is.
But nevertheless CQEngine at least deserves to be investigated for ideas
about data structures.


2015-09-17 1:19 GMT+03:00 vkulichenko <valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com>:

> javadevmtl wrote
> > Yeah it's perforamance is crazy. I hadn't experienced any "buggy" issues
> > when i tried. it also has off-heap otion now also. But I find the concept
> > of O(1) indexes very interesting...
> I think that O(1) is achievable only for hash indexes and therefore can be
> used only for equality queries. This is a very rare case in SQL and can
> barely be treated as a replacement of tree indexes.
> -Val
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Btw-anyone-heard-of-CQ-engine-tp1421p1425.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message